PolyCraft/index
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

The End of Gangland :)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
lovebird
2026-04-17 14:46:05 +02:00
parent 275fc45dfd
commit 37f277d9c7
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
ref/top-10-lies.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ The core team published a coordinated "Warning" article targeting a 8-year veter
### Analysis of the Smear
This behavior demonstrates a shift from an "Open Source Community" to a "Protected Brand." In healthy engineering circles, technical claims (e.g., "machines are inefficient") are refuted with data and testing. In this ecosystem, they are instead met with character assassination, blacklisting, and "Report This User" campaigns. Alarmingly, this hostility has been specifically directed at vulnerable community members—including a 65-year-old woman and a disabled retired software engineer—who had invested years of resources and support. It becomes evident that objective field data, collected over years of customer interaction, is perceived not as constructive feedback, but as a direct threat to the organization's extractive business model. Furthermore, this culture of targeted harassment has drawn public support from analogous organizations like Open Source Ecology, reflecting a troubling, broader trend in certain hardware projects where noble volunteer goals are used as a shield to justify censorship, discriminatory behavior, and the humiliation of dedicated contributors.
This behavior demonstrates a shift from an "Open Source Community" to a "Protected Brand." In healthy engineering circles, technical claims (e.g., "machines are inefficient") are refuted with data and testing. In this ecosystem, they are instead met with character assassination, blacklisting, and "Report This User" campaigns. Alarmingly, this hostility has been specifically directed at vulnerable community members—including a 65-year-old woman and a disabled retired software engineer—who had invested years of resources and support. Both have been not only repeatedly attacked over the years but also tricked out of their life savings due to massive abuse, defamation and corruption, as other investors. It becomes evident that objective field data, collected over years of customer interaction, is perceived not as constructive feedback, but as a direct threat to the organization's extractive business model. Furthermore, this culture of targeted harassment has drawn public support from analogous organizations like Open Source Ecology, reflecting a troubling, broader trend in certain hardware projects where noble volunteer goals are used as a shield to justify censorship, discriminatory behavior, and the humiliation of dedicated contributors.
***