Also, the change in insert-hyperlink (from `this.linkUrl.indexOf("http") === -1` to `!this.linkUrl.startsWith("http")`) was intentional fix: we don't want to prevent users from looking up topics with http in their titles.
The `unread_not_too_old` attribute is a little odd because there should never be a case where
the user's first_unread_at column is less than the `Topic#updated_at`
column of an unread topic. The `unread_not_too_old` attribute is causing
a bug where topic states synced into `TopicTrackingState` do not appear
as unread because the attribute does not exsist on a normal `Topic`
object and hence never set.
Hopefully fixes flakes like:
```
not ok 1123 Chrome 102.0 - [undefined ms] - Global error: Uncaught Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/eviltrout.json (PUT) at http://localhost:7357/assets/vendor.js, line 38378
While executing test: Unit | Utility | click-track: routes to absolute internal urls
---
browser log: |
{"type":"error","text":"Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/eviltrout.json (PUT)"}
{"type":"error","text":"Uncaught Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/eviltrout.json (PUT) at http://localhost:7357/assets/vendor.js, line 38378\n","testContext":{"id":1123,"name":"Unit | Utility | click-track: routes to absolute internal urls","items":[],"state":"executing"}}
...
```
As part of this commit, a bug where updating a tag's notification level on the server side does not update the state of the user's tag notification levels on the client side is fixed too.
This commit seeks to only handle the `f=tracked` and `filter=tracked`
query params for a topic list. There are other "hidden" filters for a
topic list which can be activated by passing the right query param to
the request. However, they are hidden because there is no way to
activate those filters via the UI. We are handling the `f=tracked`
filter because we will soon be adding a link that allows a user to
quickly view their tracked topics.
* When loading topics in bulk, only trigger state change callbacks after
all the topics have been loaded and we determine that state has actually
changed.
* State change callbacks are also only triggered when state has changed.
The use of JSON.stringify might raise some performance concerns here as this is a
performance sensitive codepath. However, I measured the time for each
`_setState` function call locally, by wrapping the function call with
`performance.now()`, and did not see any significant overhead.
This commit fixes two issues at play. The first was introduced
in f6c852b (or maybe not introduced
but rather revealed). When a user posted a new message in a topic,
they received the unread topic tracking state MessageBus message,
and the Unread (X) indicator was incremented by one, because with the
aforementioned perf commit we "guess" the correct last read post
for the user, because we no longer calculate individual users' read
status there. This meant that every time a user posted in a topic
they tracked, the unread indicator was incremented. To get around
this, we can just exclude the user who created the post from the
target users of the unread state message.
The second issue was related to the private message topic tracking
state, and was somewhat similar. Whenever a user created a new private
message, the New (X) indicator was incremented, and could not be
cleared until the page was refreshed. To solve this, we just don't
update the topic state for the user when the new_topic tracking state
message comes through if the user who created the topic is the
same as the current user.
cf. https://meta.discourse.org/t/bottom-of-topic-shows-there-is-1-unread-remaining-when-there-are-actually-0-unread-topics-remaining/220817
Previously we only supported a single 'required tag group' for a category. This commit allows admins to specify multiple required tag groups, each with their own minimum tag count.
A new category_required_tag_groups database table replaces the existing columns on the categories table. Data is automatically migrated.
The current implementation ties the filter query params tightly to the
`summary` attribute on the post stream model making it hard to support
other filters.
Previously we were publishing one messagebus message per user which was 'tracking' a topic. On large sites, this can easily be 1000+ messages. The important information in the message is common between all users, so we can manage with a single message on a shared channel, which will be much more efficient.
For user-specific values (notification_level and last_read_post_number), the JS app can infer values which are 'good enough'. Correct values will be loaded as soon as a topic-list containing the topic is visited.
When parent category or grandparent category is muted, then category should be muted as well.
Still, it can be overridden by setting individual subcategory notification level.
CategoryUser record is not created, mute for subcategories is purely virtual.
TopicTrackingState should correctly set filterCategory and filterTag for all different configurations.
When filterTag exists and new_topic message arrives, it ensures that filterTag is included in payload tags
If filterTag is part of payload tags, message that new topics are available is displayed and after click, new topics are included in the list.
In the commit d8bf2810ff we hoisted
the userOptionFields array to a module-level variable, but kept
the code inside save() the same. This causes an issue where if
save() is called twice on the same user with some array of user
option fields, the userOptionFields array is mutated, which means
the second save is likely not saving the fields intended.
This commit fixes the issue by not mutating the array. We cannot
change them into consts though, because we have an API to add more
items to the array.
The leak was introduced in #11722 and a test was added that relied on it in #14563
This PR fixes the leak (bookmarks-test), fixes the test that relied on it (fast-edit-test), and repleces some ad-hoc code with cloneJSON helper (other files)
Currently when a user creates posts that are moderated (for whatever
reason), a popup is displayed saying the post needs approval and the
total number of the user’s pending posts. But then this piece of
information is kind of lost and there is nowhere for the user to know
what are their pending posts or how many there are.
This patch solves this issue by adding a new “Pending” section to the
user’s activity page when there are some pending posts to display. When
there are none, then the “Pending” section isn’t displayed at all.
We were previously showing the "n new or updated topics" alert on
category routes like `/c/category-slug/ID/none` on every new/unread
topic update. This PR looks up the category by ID, which should be more
precise.
The method was only used for mega topics but it was redundant as the
first post can be determined from using the condition where
`Post#post_number` equal to one.
The previous excerpt was a simple truncated raw message. Starting with
this commit, the raw content of the draft is cooked and an excerpt is
extracted from it. The logic for extracting the excerpt mimics the the
`ExcerptParser` class, but does not implement all functionality, being
a much simpler implementation.
The two draft controllers have been merged into one and the /draft.json
route has been changed to /drafts.json to be consistent with the other
route names.
The error was:
```
↪ Unit | Model | topic::recover [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | emoji::emojiUnescape [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | pretty-text::quoting a quote [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | click-track::routes to internal urlsUnhandled request in test environment: /forum/t/1234/recover (PUT)
Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/t/1234/recover (PUT)
at Pretender.server.unhandledRequest (discourse/tests/setup-tests:173:15)
at Pretender.handleRequest (pretender:400:14)
at FakeRequest.send (pretender:169:21)
at Object.send (jquery:10100:10)
at Function.ajax (jquery:9683:15)
at performAjax (discourse/app/lib/ajax:174:19)
at eval (discourse/app/lib/ajax:183:11)
at invokeCallback (ember:63104:17)
at publish (ember:63087:9)
at eval (ember:57463:16)
[✘]
```
* DEV: Don't duplicate a function
* pretender wasn't catching the request because it ran after this test finished
* restore wasn't needed, we do `sinon.restore()` after each test
The error was:
```
↪ Unit | Model | user::resolvedTimezone [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | url::routeTo with prefixUnhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
at Pretender.server.unhandledRequest (discourse/tests/setup-tests:173:15)
at Pretender.handleRequest (pretender:400:14)
at FakeRequest.send (pretender:169:21)
at Object.send (jquery:10100:10)
at Function.ajax (jquery:9683:15)
at performAjax (discourse/app/lib/ajax:174:19)
at eval (discourse/app/lib/ajax:183:11)
at invokeCallback (ember:63104:17)
at publish (ember:63087:9)
at eval (ember:57463:16)
[✘]
```
A minimal reproduction:
`http://localhost:3001/qunit?seed=3&testId=da76996b&testId=e52a53e7`
I merged this PR in yesterday, finally thinking this was done https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12958 but then a wild performance regression occurred. These are the problem methods:
1aa20bd681/app/serializers/topic_tracking_state_serializer.rb (L13-L21)
Turns out date comparison is super expensive on the backend _as well as_ the frontend.
The fix was to just move the `treat_as_new_topic_start_date` into the SQL query rather than using the slower `UserOption#treat_as_new_topic_start_date` method in ruby. After this change, 1% of the total time is spent with the `created_in_new_period` comparison instead of ~20%.
----
History:
Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.
The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402
If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.
To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.
When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).
I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.
Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)
<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
