* DEV: Remove badge-select-controller
1. The `selectableUserBadges` computed property of `badge-title` was being incorrectly overwritten, which triggered computed-property.override deprecation.
2. The `badge-select-controller` mixin contained properties that were used either by `badge-title` component or `badges/show` controller, but none were being used by both. This change moves properties where they belong, and removes the mixin.
* Update app/assets/javascripts/discourse/controllers/badges/show.js.es6
Co-Authored-By: Robin Ward <robin.ward@gmail.com>
* Improve code brevity
The 'automatically set primary group' checkbox looked like it was associated with the email membership. In fact, it applies to all members who join the group. This commit moves it next to the 'automatic trust level' setting, and puts them both under an 'Effects' heading
* FEATURE: Added input for name when creating a new authenticator in user preferences
* FEATURE: Added placeholders to authenticator inputs
* Ran prettier on second-factor-add-totp.js.es6
* Fix broken security key 2FA on mobile login.hbs
* Show nicer error message when a security key already exists
* [COPY] Disable -> Delete for security key editing
* Standardize UI elements in 2FA prefs password confirmation
* Minor fixes to label location for resetPasswordProgress
Adds 2 factor authentication method via second factor security keys over [web authn](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Authentication_API).
Allows a user to authenticate a second factor on login, login-via-email, admin-login, and change password routes. Adds registration area within existing user second factor preferences to register multiple security keys. Supports both external (yubikey) and built-in (macOS/android fingerprint readers).
If you click a (?) icon beside the reviewable status a pop up will
appear with expanded informatio that explains how the reviewable got its
score, and how it compares to system thresholds.
This was primarily an issue on mobile, where after clicking the "Messsage" button in the user card, the composer would load behind the user card overlay.
* Revert "Revert "FEATURE: Publish read state on group messages. (#7989) [Undo revert] (#8024)""
This reverts commit 36425eb9f0.
* Fix: Show who read only if the attribute is enabled
* PERF: Precalculate the last post readed by a group member
* Use book-reader icon instear of far-eye
* FIX: update topic groups correctly
* DEV: Tidy up read indicator update on write
* Reenable: "FEATURE: Publish read state on group messages. (#7989)"
This reverts commit 67f5cc1ce8.
* FIX: Read indicator only appears when the group setting is enabled
* Enable or disable read state based on group attribute
* When read state needs to be published, the minimum unread count is calculated in the topic query. This way, we can know if someone reads the last post
* The option can be enabled/disabled from the UI
* The read indicator will live-updated using message bus
* Show read indicator on every post
* The read indicator now shows read count and can be expanded to see user avatars
* Read count gets updated everytime someone reads a message
* Simplify topic-list read indicator logic
* Unsubscribe from message bus on willDestroyElement, removed unnecesarry values from post-menu, and added a comment to explain where does minimum_unread_count comes from
* FEATURE: Incorporate PWA install prompt into Discourse UI
This is mainly done so Discourse forums stop nagging people to install
on the very first visits to a website.
We will prevent the native install "mini-info" bar from ever appearing,
capture the event that pops with it, and delay it until the user meets
our criteria, which currently is trust_level 1.
If the event happens and the user meets our criteria we show a Discourse
alert banner proposing the install to the user. Dismissal of the banner
is recorded so the user ins't bothered anymore on the same device.
Co-Authored-By: Gerhard Schlager <mail@gerhard-schlager.at>
Co-Authored-By: Joffrey JAFFEUX <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
There are 5 visibility levels (similar to group visibility)
public (default)
logged-in users
members only
staff
owners
Admins & group owners always have visibility to group members.
* UX: Show a warning when admin clicks save without adding group when changing category permissions
* Use div rather than pseudo element
* Don't pass controller to component
* Use observer instead of a delay
* Refactor
* Rename to validator
* validator is much better than saveValidator
* FEATURE: Add search operator to see all direct messages from a user
* Only show message if related messages >= 5
* Make "all messages" the hyperlink
* Review
If a post arrives via email but must be reviewed, we now show an
icon that can be clicked to view the raw contents of the email.
This is useful if Discourse's email parser is acting odd and the user
reviewing the post wants to know what the original contents were before
approving/rejecting the post.
- adds a migration renaming FA4 icon names in badges
- allows all icons to be used in badges (previously was limited to icons prefixed with fa-)
- renames remaining FA 4.7 icons equivalents
Groups can now be marked as visible to "logged on users". All automatic groups (except `everyone`) are now visible to "logged on users", previously they were marked as public but suppressed in the group page for non-staff.
This commit attempts to improve the experience by:
- showing time input as disabled on any platform if date hasn't been set
- showing a placeholder --:-- to emphasize the expected format
* Expose a new plugin outlet. Pass group model to the group-member-dropdown so it can be accessed by plugins
* Added controller tests for group custom fields. update custom fields when updating a group
We now show if a queued or flagged post is a reply to another when in
the review queue. It's especially helpful for queued posts where
normally they are linked to the topic where they are created, and you
have no context about the reply.
Note that this will only apply to new queued posts going forward.
Previously queued posts will not show the "in reply to"