User flair was given by user's primary group. This PR separates the
two, adds a new field to the user model for flair group ID and users
can select their flair from user preferences now.
A more complex algorithm was used to achieve consensus between server
and client lists of notifications. This commit uses a different and
more simple approach that ignores order, but updates read status of
existing notifications and removes stale notifications.
And also move all the "top topics by period" routes to query string param.
/top/monthly => /top?period=monthly
/c/:slug/:id/l/top/monthly => /c/:slug/:id/l/top?period=monthly
/tag/:slug/l/top/daily => /tag/:slug/l/top?period=daily (new)
This PR changes the order of the topic timer options
into a more logical order when the topic is open/closed.
Also, we are now hiding the "Schedule Publishing" option
if the topic is not a private message or in a private category.
It does not make sense to schedule publishing to a different
category for a public topic.
Multiselect data can be saved but when all are removed then data are not cleared
Ajax function is removing an empty array from request data. In that case, we should change `[]` to `null`.
We need that empty values to properly empty data.
The error was:
```
↪ Unit | Model | topic::recover [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | emoji::emojiUnescape [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | pretty-text::quoting a quote [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | click-track::routes to internal urlsUnhandled request in test environment: /forum/t/1234/recover (PUT)
Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/t/1234/recover (PUT)
at Pretender.server.unhandledRequest (discourse/tests/setup-tests:173:15)
at Pretender.handleRequest (pretender:400:14)
at FakeRequest.send (pretender:169:21)
at Object.send (jquery:10100:10)
at Function.ajax (jquery:9683:15)
at performAjax (discourse/app/lib/ajax:174:19)
at eval (discourse/app/lib/ajax:183:11)
at invokeCallback (ember:63104:17)
at publish (ember:63087:9)
at eval (ember:57463:16)
[✘]
```
* DEV: Don't duplicate a function
We changed (https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/13407) behaviour of the topic level bookmark button recently. That PR made the button be opening the edit bookmark modal when there is only one bookmark on the topic instead of just removing that bookmark as it was before.
This PR fixes the next problems that weren't taken into account in the previous PR:
1. Everything should work fine even on very big topics when a bookmarked post is unloaded from the post stream. I've added code that loads the post we need and makes everything work as expected
2. When at least one bookmark on the topic has a reminder, we should always be showing the icon with a clock on the topic level bookmark button
3. We should show correct tooltips for the topic level bookmark button
We want to submit the flag modal on pressing CTRL + ENTER and CMD + ENTER.
Here's how our modals work:
Every modal can be dismissed by pressing ESC. This behaviour can be disabled for a specific modal if we need to.
Every modal can be submitted by pressing ENTER if the cursor wasn't on a text area or a form at the moment of pressing.
Now, the flag modal is actually a one big form and pressing ENTER doesn't submit it. I've added submitting by CTRL+ENTER but at first it was interfering with the basic modal submitting by ENTER. It's a pretty tricky thing to fix because we use the keyup event for submitting by ENTER and we need to use the keydown event for submitting with modifiers (because submitting by CMD+ENTER on Macs doesn't work with keyup).
Eventually, I fixed the problem just by adding a possibility to disable default submitting on ENTER (in the same way as we already have the possibility of disabling dismissing on ESC). Then I disabled default submitting for the flag form and implemented submitting by CTRL+ENTER and CMD+ENTER. This way everything is simple and robust. I did it only for the flag modal but it'll be easy and safe to add the same behaviour to another modal.
Add Members could also invite new users via emails, but that was a less
known fact. Splitting the previous modal into two more accessible
modals should make this feature more discoverable.
Effectively reverts 3ddc33b07c
Makes the failure states testable; see the uncommented test.
I don't think we're re-catching these errors anyway?
_update:_
We did in a single instance in discourse-code-review but it wasn't really intentional and I fixed it in https://github.com/discourse/discourse-code-review/pull/73
* pretender wasn't catching the request because it ran after this test finished
* restore wasn't needed, we do `sinon.restore()` after each test
The error was:
```
↪ Unit | Model | user::resolvedTimezone [✔]
↪ Unit | Utility | url::routeTo with prefixUnhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
Error: Unhandled request in test environment: /forum/u/chuck.json (PUT)
at Pretender.server.unhandledRequest (discourse/tests/setup-tests:173:15)
at Pretender.handleRequest (pretender:400:14)
at FakeRequest.send (pretender:169:21)
at Object.send (jquery:10100:10)
at Function.ajax (jquery:9683:15)
at performAjax (discourse/app/lib/ajax:174:19)
at eval (discourse/app/lib/ajax:183:11)
at invokeCallback (ember:63104:17)
at publish (ember:63087:9)
at eval (ember:57463:16)
[✘]
```
A minimal reproduction:
`http://localhost:3001/qunit?seed=3&testId=da76996b&testId=e52a53e7`
Sometimes oneboxes contain the same link multiple times and the link
count was shown for each of them. This commit adds link count only to
the most important link, that being either a heading or the header of
the onebox.
The generated regular expressions did not contain \b which matched
every text that contained the word, even if it was only a substring of
a word.
For example, if "art" was a watched word a post containing word
"artist" matched.
The dismiss new keyboard shortcut (x,r) has been broken since
7a79bd7da3. A fix was done and JS
tests were added in 006d52f32b
and b01e4738ab but the test was not
quite correct and so the bottom dismiss new button was not clicked.
This also fixes an issue with our keyboard shortcut click handling.
If multiple elements matched the selector they were all clicked. Now
we just click the first match.
If you click on a bookmark in the post stream you get an Edit Bookmark modal. This does not happen if you click the topic bookmark button.
We want to open the Edit modal too if there is only one bookmark on a topic (it doesn't matter on the first post or not). The other behaviour if there are > 1 bookmarks in the topic is to prompt the user to confirm delete of all the bookmarks in the topic. This behaviour will stay as-is.
I have done some refactoring in this PR, and still, there is a place for improvement. For example, we don't call post.deleteBookmark() method when deleting several bookmarks. I just don't want to refactor too much in one PR.
The first thing we needed here was an enum rather than a boolean to determine how a directory_column was created. Now we have `automatic`, `user_field` and `plugin` directory columns.
This plugin API is assuming that the plugin has added a migration to a column to the `directory_items` table.
This was created to be initially used by discourse-solved. PR with API usage - https://github.com/discourse/discourse-solved/pull/137/
Adds the last updated at and by SMTP/IMAP fields to the UI, we were already storing them in the DB. Also makes sure that `imap_mailbox_name` being changed makes the last_updated_at/by field update for IMAP.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create bookmarks for several posts on a topic
- Click the topic level bookmark button, it’ll open the modal that asks to confirm clearing all bookmarks from the topic
- Choose No
- Try to push the topic level bookmark button again - it won’t work
And it's fixed with this commit
This can happen when an avatar-flair component is rendered to an anonymous user on a login_required site (e.g. when they are redeeming an invite). The lack of group information was causing an error to be raised. With this commit, it now simple skips rendering the flair.
* Revert "DEV: skips three tests following cc1e73 (#13386)"
This reverts commit 2be201660a.
* FIX: Do not refresh post stream twice
This also improves the test suite and simulates a long running request
* FIX: Update local copy of raw
Next Week should mean next Monday, Next Month - the first day of the next month, and so on.
Also, we'll be using the name "Next Monday" instead of "Next Week" because it's easier to understand. No one can get confused by next Monday.
* DEV: skips two tests following cc1e73
Following the fix in cc1e73b8e4 we now refresh the whole stream which causes expected states of these tests to not exist anymore.
I'm skipping theses tests while we decide for a better fix.
We previously only showed the link to the Email section
of group settings if both SMTP and IMAP were enabled for
a site, but this is not necessary now, only SMTP can be
enabled by itself so we should show the section if SMTP
is enabled.
Rendering an empty flair element with the css `background-image: url();` causes the browser to attempt an image request against the current document URL. Making duplicate requests for the document URL can cause some unusual race conditions, especially related to cookies. If this user-avatar-flair element was present on the site homepage (e.g. if categories+latest is the homepage), then it can prevent the signup flow from working correctly.
This commit updates the user-avatar-flair component to be a transparent wrapper around the avatar-flair component. If the user has no flair, no avatar-flair element will be rendered. This avoids the `background-image: url();` situation, and fixes the auth flow.
This commit also removes the duplicate avatar flair rendering from the `latest-topic-list-item` component. This wasn't particularly obvious, since the duplicate flairs were being rendered directly on top of each other.
The problem was happening in component integration tests on the rendering stage, sometimes the rendering would never finish.
Using time moments in the future when faking time solves the problem. Unfortunately, I don't know why exactly it helps. It was just a lucky guess after some hours I spent trying to figure out what's going on. But I've done a lot of testings, so looks like it really works. I'll be monitoring builds for some time after merging this anyway.
Unit tests seem to work alright with moments in the past. And we don't fake time in acceptance tests at the moment but I guess they would very likely be flaky with time moments from the past since they also do rendering.
I'm actually thinking of moving all fake time moments to the future (including moments in unit tests) to decrease the chances of flakiness. But I don't want to do everything in one PR, because I can accidentally introduce new flakiness.
A pretty easy way of picking time moments in the future for tests is to use the 2100 year. It has the same calendar as 2021. If a day is Monday in 2021 it's Monday in 2100 too.
Before this fix if your forum was set up with a subfolder and you
clicked on a link to a different subfolder it would not work. For
example:
subfolder: /cool
link is: /about-us
Previously it would try to resolve /about-us as /cool/about-us. With
this fix it redirects to /about-us correctly.
* UX: Improvements to reorder categories UX
Before, moving a category from, for example, position 25 to position 0 would result in switching the positions of the two categories at those positions.
Category A at position 0 would move to position 25, and Category B at position 25 would move to position 0.
Instead of switching positions, the reorder categories function should retain the order of categories except for the one being moved.
So, Category B at position 25 would still move to position 0, but Category A is merely bumped down to position 1.
This improves the UX because if a user *really* wants to switch the two categories, it results in one extra step. However in the other (what I think is normal) case, it saves the 24 other switches the user has to make to get Category A back to position 1 (you can imagine the user having to click the up arrow button repeatedly to return Category A to the top of the page). Now, imagine trying to do this with a site with 100s of categories. Yikes!
The UX improvement described above is what this commit accomplishes by redesigning the `move()` method of the reorder-categories controller. It adds some overhead to adjust the positions of all categories in between the origin and target positions, but in testing this is not noticible to the user. It's better for the computer to do extra work than the user.
* UX: Allow decimal input in reorder-categories for more precise positioning.
A common UX pattern when reordering a list of items is to allow a user to specify a target position as a decimal between two valid integer positions. The user is indicating they want the target list item to move in between the list items at the positions on either side of the target position.
For example, say there are three categories Category A at position 0, Category B at position 1, and Category C at position 3.
To move Category C in between Categories A and B, a user can now simply update Category C's position to 0.5.
The `ember_jquery` bundle contains production builds of Ember and jQuery
which doesn't work with tests. This commits introduces a new
`theme_qunit_vendor` bundle which is copy of the `vendor` bundle but
doesn't contain `ember_jquery`.
This commit is a partial revert of
409c8585e4
