generated from polymech/site-template
2.9 KiB
2.9 KiB
Here's a comparative overview of open-source SBOM tools presented in a Markdown table format:
Open Source SBOM Tools Comparison
| Tool Name | Supported Formats | Key Features | Source Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syft | SPDX, CycloneDX, Syft | CLI tool for container/image analysis, supports multiple Linux distros | GitHub [6][14] |
| Microsoft SBOM Tool | SPDX 2.2 | Enterprise-ready, Docker image support, component detection library | GitHub [2][3][6] |
| Dependency-Track | CycloneDX | Vulnerability visualization, component analysis platform | GitHub [2] |
| CycloneDX Generator | CycloneDX | Multi-language support, API server integration, dependency tree analysis | GitHub [6][12] |
| SPDX SBOM Generator | SPDX | Supports 15+ package managers, CLI interface | GitHub [6] |
| DISTRO2SBOM | SPDX, CycloneDX | Linux package detection, OS-agnostic analysis | GitHub [6] |
| Tern | SPDX, CycloneDX, YAML | Container layer analysis, license compliance focus | GitHub [6] |
| IBM SBOM Utility | CycloneDX, SPDX | Validation against JSON schemas, license policy management | GitHub [9][11] |
Key technical differentiators:
- Format specialization: Syft and cdxgen offer multi-format support[6][14][12], while Microsoft's tool focuses exclusively on SPDX[3][6]
- Containerization: Syft and Tern specialize in container/image analysis[6][14]
- Language support: CycloneDX Generator supports 30+ programming languages[6][12]
- Enterprise features: IBM's utility offers schema validation and policy management[9][11], Microsoft's tool integrates with build pipelines[6]
For developers working with TypeScript ecosystems, Syft and SPDX SBOM Generator offer native npm/yarn support[6][14], while the IBM utility provides API integration capabilities[11] that could complement CI/CD pipelines.